Evidence level and quality rating: | |
Article title: Morbidly obese patients’ experiences of mobility during hospitalization and rehabilitation: A qualitative descriptive study | Number: Vol. 34 No. 1 2018 |
Author(s): Caz Hales, R. N., Nicky Curran, R. N., Dip, O. S. H., & Kay de Vries, R. N. | Publication date: March 2018 |
Journal: Nursing Praxis in New Zealand | |
Setting: Clinical | Sample (composition and size): 7 Patients with Morbid Obesity |
Does this evidence address my EBP question? | |
Is this study: Measurable data (how many; how much; or how often) used to formulate facts, uncover patterns in research, and generalize results from a larger sample population; provides observed effects of a program, problem, or condition, measured precisely, rather than through researcher interpretation of data. Common methods are surveys, face-to-face structured interviews, observations, and reviews of records or documents. Statistical tests are used in data analysis. Rich narrative documents are used for uncovering themes; describes a problem or condition from the point of view of those experiencing it. Common methods are focus groups, individual interviews (unstructured or semi structured), and participation/observations. Sample sizes are small and are determined when data saturation is achieved. Data saturation is reached when the researcher identifies that no new themes emerge, and redundancy is occurring. Synthesis is used in data analysis. Often a starting point for studies when little research exists; may use results to design empirical studies. The researcher describes, analyzes, and interprets reports, descriptions, and observations from participants. Both quaNtitative and quaLitative methods are used in the study design. Using both approaches, in combination, provides a better understanding of research problems than using either approach alone. Sample sizes vary based on the methods used. Data collection involves collecting and analyzing both quaNtitative and quaLitative data in a single study or series of studies. Interpretation is continual and can influence stages in the research process. |
Section I: QuaNtitative | ||
Level of Evidence (Study Design) | ||
Yes | No Go to B | |
1. Was there manipulation of an independent variable? | Yes | No |
2. Was there a control group? | Yes | No |
3. Were study participants randomly assigned to the intervention and control groups? | Yes | No |
If Yes to questions 1, 2, and 3, this is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) or experimental study. | LEVEL I | |
If Yes to questions 1 and 2 and No to question 3orYes to question 1 and No to questions 2 and 3, this is quasi-experimental. (Some degree of investigator control, some manipulation of an independent variable, lacks random assignment to groups, and may have a control group). | LEVEL II | |
If No to questions 1, 2, and 3, this is nonexperimental. (No manipulation of independent variable; can be descriptive, comparative, or correlational; often uses secondary data). | LEVEL III | |
Study Findings That Help Answer the EBP Question | ||
Skip to the Appraisal of QuaNtitative Research Studies section |
Section I: QuaNtitative (continued) | ||
Is this a summary of multiple sources of research evidence? | Yes Continue | No Use Appendix F |
1. Does it employ a comprehensive search strategy and rigorous appraisal method? If this study includes research, nonresearch, and experiential evidence, it is an integrative review (see Appendix F). | Yes Continue | No Use Appendix F |
B 2. For systematic reviews and systematic reviews with meta-analysis (see descriptions below): | ||
Are all studies included RCTs? | LEVEL I | |
Are the studies a combination of RCTs and quasi-experimental, or quasi-experimental only? | LEVEL II | |
Are the studies a combination of RCTs, quasi-experimental, and nonexperimental, or non- experimental only? | LEVEL III | |
A systematic review employs a search strategy and a rigorous appraisal method but does not generate an effect size. A meta-analysis, or systematic review with meta-analysis, combines, and analyzes results from studies to generate a new statistic: the effect size. | ||
Study Findings That Help Answer the EBP Question | ||
Skip to the Appraisal of Systematic Review (With or Without a Meta-Analysis) section |
Appraisal of QuaNtitative Research Studies | |||
Does the researcher identify what is known and not known about the problem and how the study will address any gaps in knowledge? | Yes | No | |
Was the purpose of the study clearly presented? | Yes | No | |
Was the literature review current (most sources within the past five years or a seminal study)? | Yes | No | |
Was sample size sufficient based on study design and rationale? | Yes | No | |
If there is a control group: Were the characteristics and/or demographics similar in both the control and intervention groups? | Yes | No | N/A |
If multiple settings were used, were the settings similar? | Yes | No | N/A |
Were all groups equally treated except for the intervention group(s)? | Yes | No | N/A |
Are data collection methods described clearly? | Yes | No | |
Were the instruments reliable (Cronbach’sa[alpha] > 0.70)? | Yes | No | N/A |
Was instrument validity discussed? | Yes | No | N/A |
If surveys or questionnaires were used, was the response rate > 25%? | Yes | No | N/A |
Were the results presented clearly? | Yes | No | |
If tables were presented, was the narrative consistent with the table content? | Yes | No | N/A |
Were study limitations identified and addressed? | Yes | No | |
Were conclusions based on results? | Yes | No | |
Complete theQuality Rating for QuaNtitative Studiessection |
Appraisal of Systematic Review (With or Without Meta-Analysis) | ||
Were the variables of interest clearly identified? | Yes | No |
Was the search comprehensive and reproducible? Key search terms stated | Yes | No |
Multiple databases searched and identified | Yes | No |
Inclusion and exclusion criteria stated | Yes | No |
Was there a flow diagram that included the number of studies eliminated at each level of review? | Yes | No |
Were details of included studies presented (design, sample, methods, results, outcomes, strengths, and limitations)? | Yes | No |
Were methods for appraising the strength of evidence (level and quality) described? | Yes | No |
Were conclusions based on results? | Yes | No |
Results were interpreted | Yes | No |
Conclusions flowed logically from the interpretation and systematic review question | Yes | No |
Did the systematic review include a section addressing limitations andhow they were addressed? | Yes | No |
Complete theQuality Rating for QuaNtitative Studies section (below) |
Quality Rating for QuaNtitative Studies |
Circle the appropriate quality rating below: A High quality: Consistent, generalizable results; sufficient sample size for the study design; adequate control; definitive conclusions; consistent recommendations based on comprehensive literature review that includes thorough reference to scientific evidence. B Good quality: Reasonably consistent results; sufficient sample size for the study design; some control, and fairly definitive conclusions; reasonably consistent recommendations based on fairly comprehensive literature review that includes some reference to scientific evidence. C Low quality or major flaws: Little evidence with inconsistent results; insufficient sample size for the study design; conclusions cannot be drawn. |
Section II: QuaLitative | ||
Level of Evidence (Study Design) | ||
A Is this a report of a single research study? | Yes this is Level III | No go to II B |
Study Findings That Help Answer the EBP Question There is relationship between Morbid Obesity and limited mobility. | ||
Complete theAppraisal of Single QuaLitative Research Studysection(below) |
Appraisal of a Single QuaLitative Research Study | ||
Was there a clearly identifiable and articulated: Purpose? | Yes | No |
Researchquestion? | Yes | No |
Justificationformethod(s)used? | Yes | No |
Phenomenonthatisthefocusoftheresearch? | Yes | No |
Were study sample participants representative? | Yes | No |
Did they have knowledge of or experience with the research area? | Yes | No |
Were participant characteristics described? | Yes | No |
Was sampling adequate, as evidenced by achieving saturation of data? | Yes | No |
Data analysis: Was a verification process used in every step by checking and confirming with participants the trustworthiness of analysis and interpretation? | Yes | No |
Was there a description of how data were analyzed (i.e., method), by computer or manually? | Yes | No |
Do findings support the narrative data (quotes)? | Yes | No |
Do findings flow from research question to data collected to analysis undertaken? | Yes | No |
Are conclusions clearly explained? | Yes | No |
Skip to theQuality Rating for QuaLitative Studiessection |
B ForsummariesofmultiplequaLitativeresearchstudies(meta-synthesis), wasacomprehensivesearchstrategyandrigorousappraisalmethodused? | Yes Level III | No go to Appendix F |
Study Findings That Help Answer the EBP Question | ||
Complete the Appraisal of Meta-Synthesis Studies section (below) |
Appraisal of Meta-Synthesis Studies | ||
Were the search strategy and criteria for selecting primary studies clearly defined? | Yes | No |
Were findings appropriate and convincing? | Yes | No |
Was a description of methods used to: Compare findings from each study? | Yes | No |
Interpret data? | Yes | No |
Did synthesis reflect: | Yes | No |
New insights? | Yes | No |
Discovery of essential features of phenomena? | Yes | No |
A fuller understanding of the phenomena? | Yes | No |
Was sufficient data presented to support the interpretations? | Yes | No |
Complete the Quality Rating for QuaLititative Studies section (below) |
Quality Rating for QuaLitative Studies |
Circle the appropriate quality rating below: No commonly agreed-on principles exist for judging the quality of quaLitative studies. It is a subjective process based on the extent to which study data contributes to synthesis and how much information is known about the researchers’ efforts to meet the appraisal criteria. For meta-synthesis, there is preliminary agreement that quality assessments should be made before synthesis to screen out poor-quality studies1. A/B High/Good quality is used for single studies and meta-syntheses2. The report discusses efforts to enhance or evaluate the quality of the data and the overall inquiry in sufficient detail; and it describes the specific techniques used to enhance the quality of the inquiry. Evidence of some or all of the following is found in the report: Transparency: Describes how information was documented to justify decisions, how data were reviewed by others, and how themes and categories were formulated.Diligence: Reads and rereads data to check interpretations; seeks opportunity to find multiple sources to corroborate evidence.Verification: The process of checking, confirming, and ensuring methodologic coherence.Self-reflection and self-scrutiny: Being continuously aware of how a researcher’s experiences, background, or prejudices might shape and bias analysis and interpretations.Participant-driven inquiry: Participants shape the scope and breadth of questions; analysis and interpretation give voice to those who participated.Insightful interpretation: Data and knowledge are linked in meaningful ways to relevant literature. CLower-quality studies contribute little to the overall review of findings and have few, if any, of the features listed for High/Good quality. |
1 https://www.york.ac.uk/crd/SysRev/!SSL!/WebHelp/6_4_ASSESSMENT_OF_QUALITATIVE_RESEARCH.htm
2 Adapted from Polit & Beck (2017).
Section III: Mixed Methods | ||
Level of Evidence (Study Design) | ||
You will need to appraise both the quaNtitative and quaLitative parts of the study independently, before appraising the study in its entirety. | ||
Evaluate the quaNitative part of the study using Section I. | Level | Quality |
Insert here the level of evidence and overall quality for this part: | ||
Evaluate the quaLitative part of the study using Section II. | Level | Quality |
Insert here the level of evidence and overall quality for this part: | ||
To determine the level of evidence, circle the appropriate study design: | ||
Explanatory sequential designs collect quaNtitative data first, followed by the quaLitative data; and their purpose is to explain quaNtitative results using quaLitative findings. The level is determined based on the level of the quaNtitative part.Exploratory sequential designs collect quaLitative data first, followed by the quaNtitative data; and their purpose is to explain quaLitative findings using the quaNtitative results. The level is determined based on the level of the quaLitative part, and it is always Level III.Convergent parallel designs collect the quaLitative and quaNtitative data concurrently for the purpose of providing a more complete understanding of a phenomenon by merging both datasets. These designs are Level III.Multiphasic designs collect quaLitative and quaNtitative data over more than one phase, with each phase informing the next phase. These designs are Level III. | ||
Study Findings That Help Answer the EBP Question | ||
Complete the Appraisal of Mixed Methods Studiessection (below) |
Appraisal of Mixed Methods Studies3 | |||
Wasthemixed-methodsresearchdesignrelevanttoaddressthe quaNtitative and quaLitative research questions (orobjectives)? | Yes | No | N/A |
WastheresearchdesignrelevanttoaddressthequaNtitativeand quaLitative aspects of the mixed-methods question (orobjective)? | Yes | No | N/A |
Forconvergentparalleldesigns,wastheintegrationofquaNtitative andquaLitativedata(orresults)relevanttoaddresstheresearch question orobjective? | Yes | No | N/A |
For convergent parallel designs, were the limitations associated withtheintegration(forexample,thedivergenceofquaLitativeand quaNtitative data or results) sufficientlyaddressed? | Yes | No | N/A |
Complete theQuality Rating for Mixed-Method Studies section (below) |
3 National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools. (2015). Appraising Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Studies included in Mixed Studies Reviews: The MMAT. Hamilton, ON: McMaster University. (Updated 20 July, 2015) Retrieved from http://www.nccmt.ca/resources/search/232
Quality Rating for Mixed-Methods Studies |
Circle the appropriate quality rating below A Highquality:Containshigh-qualityquaNtitativeandquaLitativestudycomponents;highlyrelevant studydesign;relevant integration of data or results;and careful considerationofthelimitationsof the chosen approach. B Goodquality:Containsgood-qualityquaNtitativeandquaLitativestudycomponents;relevantstudy design;moderatelyrelevantintegrationofdataorresults;andsomediscussionoflimitationsof integration. CLow quality or major flaws: Contains low quality quaNtitative and quaLitative study components; studydesignnotrelevanttoresearchquestionsorobjectives;poorlyintegrateddataorresults;and noconsiderationoflimitsofintegration. |
Get professional assignment help cheaply
Are you busy and do not have time to handle your assignment? Are you scared that your paper will not make the grade? Do you have responsibilities that may hinder you from turning in your assignment on time? Are you tired and can barely handle your assignment? Are your grades inconsistent?
Whichever your reason may is, it is valid! You can get professional academic help from our service at affordable rates. We have a team of professional academic writers who can handle all your assignments.
Our essay writers are graduates with diplomas, bachelor, masters, Ph.D., and doctorate degrees in various subjects. The minimum requirement to be an essay writer with our essay writing service is to have a college diploma. When assigning your order, we match the paper subject with the area of specialization of the writer.
Why choose our academic writing service?
- Plagiarism free papers
- Timely delivery
- Any deadline
- Skilled, Experienced Native English Writers
- Subject-relevant academic writer
- Adherence to paper instructions
- Ability to tackle bulk assignments
- Reasonable prices
- 24/7 Customer Support
- Get superb grades consistently
Get Professional Assignment Help Cheaply
Are you busy and do not have time to handle your assignment? Are you scared that your paper will not make the grade? Do you have responsibilities that may hinder you from turning in your assignment on time? Are you tired and can barely handle your assignment? Are your grades inconsistent?
Whichever your reason is, it is valid! You can get professional academic help from our service at affordable rates. We have a team of professional academic writers who can handle all your assignments.
Why Choose Our Academic Writing Service?
- Plagiarism free papers
- Timely delivery
- Any deadline
- Skilled, Experienced Native English Writers
- Subject-relevant academic writer
- Adherence to paper instructions
- Ability to tackle bulk assignments
- Reasonable prices
- 24/7 Customer Support
- Get superb grades consistently
Online Academic Help With Different Subjects
Literature
Students barely have time to read. We got you! Have your literature essay or book review written without having the hassle of reading the book. You can get your literature paper custom-written for you by our literature specialists.
Finance
Do you struggle with finance? No need to torture yourself if finance is not your cup of tea. You can order your finance paper from our academic writing service and get 100% original work from competent finance experts.
Computer science
Computer science is a tough subject. Fortunately, our computer science experts are up to the match. No need to stress and have sleepless nights. Our academic writers will tackle all your computer science assignments and deliver them on time. Let us handle all your python, java, ruby, JavaScript, php , C+ assignments!
Psychology
While psychology may be an interesting subject, you may lack sufficient time to handle your assignments. Don’t despair; by using our academic writing service, you can be assured of perfect grades. Moreover, your grades will be consistent.
Engineering
Engineering is quite a demanding subject. Students face a lot of pressure and barely have enough time to do what they love to do. Our academic writing service got you covered! Our engineering specialists follow the paper instructions and ensure timely delivery of the paper.
Nursing
In the nursing course, you may have difficulties with literature reviews, annotated bibliographies, critical essays, and other assignments. Our nursing assignment writers will offer you professional nursing paper help at low prices.
Sociology
Truth be told, sociology papers can be quite exhausting. Our academic writing service relieves you of fatigue, pressure, and stress. You can relax and have peace of mind as our academic writers handle your sociology assignment.
Business
We take pride in having some of the best business writers in the industry. Our business writers have a lot of experience in the field. They are reliable, and you can be assured of a high-grade paper. They are able to handle business papers of any subject, length, deadline, and difficulty!
Statistics
We boast of having some of the most experienced statistics experts in the industry. Our statistics experts have diverse skills, expertise, and knowledge to handle any kind of assignment. They have access to all kinds of software to get your assignment done.
Law
Writing a law essay may prove to be an insurmountable obstacle, especially when you need to know the peculiarities of the legislative framework. Take advantage of our top-notch law specialists and get superb grades and 100% satisfaction.
What discipline/subjects do you deal in?
We have highlighted some of the most popular subjects we handle above. Those are just a tip of the iceberg. We deal in all academic disciplines since our writers are as diverse. They have been drawn from across all disciplines, and orders are assigned to those writers believed to be the best in the field. In a nutshell, there is no task we cannot handle; all you need to do is place your order with us. As long as your instructions are clear, just trust we shall deliver irrespective of the discipline.
Are your writers competent enough to handle my paper?
Our essay writers are graduates with bachelor's, masters, Ph.D., and doctorate degrees in various subjects. The minimum requirement to be an essay writer with our essay writing service is to have a college degree. All our academic writers have a minimum of two years of academic writing. We have a stringent recruitment process to ensure that we get only the most competent essay writers in the industry. We also ensure that the writers are handsomely compensated for their value. The majority of our writers are native English speakers. As such, the fluency of language and grammar is impeccable.
What if I don’t like the paper?
There is a very low likelihood that you won’t like the paper.
Reasons being:
- When assigning your order, we match the paper’s discipline with the writer’s field/specialization. Since all our writers are graduates, we match the paper’s subject with the field the writer studied. For instance, if it’s a nursing paper, only a nursing graduate and writer will handle it. Furthermore, all our writers have academic writing experience and top-notch research skills.
- We have a quality assurance that reviews the paper before it gets to you. As such, we ensure that you get a paper that meets the required standard and will most definitely make the grade.
In the event that you don’t like your paper:
- The writer will revise the paper up to your pleasing. You have unlimited revisions. You simply need to highlight what specifically you don’t like about the paper, and the writer will make the amendments. The paper will be revised until you are satisfied. Revisions are free of charge
- We will have a different writer write the paper from scratch.
- Last resort, if the above does not work, we will refund your money.
Will the professor find out I didn’t write the paper myself?
Not at all. All papers are written from scratch. There is no way your tutor or instructor will realize that you did not write the paper yourself. In fact, we recommend using our assignment help services for consistent results.
What if the paper is plagiarized?
We check all papers for plagiarism before we submit them. We use powerful plagiarism checking software such as SafeAssign, LopesWrite, and Turnitin. We also upload the plagiarism report so that you can review it. We understand that plagiarism is academic suicide. We would not take the risk of submitting plagiarized work and jeopardize your academic journey. Furthermore, we do not sell or use prewritten papers, and each paper is written from scratch.
When will I get my paper?
You determine when you get the paper by setting the deadline when placing the order. All papers are delivered within the deadline. We are well aware that we operate in a time-sensitive industry. As such, we have laid out strategies to ensure that the client receives the paper on time and they never miss the deadline. We understand that papers that are submitted late have some points deducted. We do not want you to miss any points due to late submission. We work on beating deadlines by huge margins in order to ensure that you have ample time to review the paper before you submit it.
Will anyone find out that I used your services?
We have a privacy and confidentiality policy that guides our work. We NEVER share any customer information with third parties. Noone will ever know that you used our assignment help services. It’s only between you and us. We are bound by our policies to protect the customer’s identity and information. All your information, such as your names, phone number, email, order information, and so on, are protected. We have robust security systems that ensure that your data is protected. Hacking our systems is close to impossible, and it has never happened.
How our Assignment Help Service Works
1. Place an order
You fill all the paper instructions in the order form. Make sure you include all the helpful materials so that our academic writers can deliver the perfect paper. It will also help to eliminate unnecessary revisions.
2. Pay for the order
Proceed to pay for the paper so that it can be assigned to one of our expert academic writers. The paper subject is matched with the writer’s area of specialization.
3. Track the progress
You communicate with the writer and know about the progress of the paper. The client can ask the writer for drafts of the paper. The client can upload extra material and include additional instructions from the lecturer. Receive a paper.
4. Download the paper
The paper is sent to your email and uploaded to your personal account. You also get a plagiarism report attached to your paper.
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
